我看完了 內容是說 一位自幼失明的人Armagan能作畫
而且他很少迷路 並且能有空間感
對於其居住的地方的大小也有概念
他的劃能包括透視圖 就是向畫出一個正方體一般
而且能從不同角度畫
之後研究人員掃瞄他的腦 發現他作畫時
視覺區是有在活動的
但是研究者確信他並不能感覺到任何光線
文中提出了個問題：視覺是什麼？
真的只是眼中接受光線 並在腦中看到影像嗎？
顯然的 Armagan的例子否定了這個定義
※ 引述《fanchihwen (Frank)》之銘言：
: 今天那場研討會帶回來的議程內看到個參考文獻還蠻有趣
: 全文網址如下，落落長的全文我就不貼了...
: http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/mg18524841.700
: 題目是︰The art of seeing without sight
: Abstract:
: This article reports that painter Esref Armagan is in Boston to see
: if a peek inside his brain can explain how a man who has never seen can paint
: pictures that the sighted easily recognise — and even admire. He paints
: houses and mountains and lakes and faces and butterflies, but he's never seen
: any of these things. He depicts colour, shadow and perspective, but it is not
: clear how he could have witnessed these things either. Because if Armagan can
: represent images in the same way a sighted person can, it raises big
: questions not only about how our brains construct mental images, but also
: about the role those images play in seeing.
--
There is some fiction in my truth
And there is some truth in my fiction
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.63.100.115