[請益] 這段原文 看得有點霧煞煞@@

[charlingcros (做些什麼吧)]

最近這陣子 閒來沒啥事
跟同學在學校的資料庫中看一些paper的摘要
其中看到一篇的結尾部分覺得怪怪的,如下:

 We consider a price adjustment process in a model of monopolistic competition
. Firms have incomplete information about the demand structure. When they set
 a price they observe the amount they can sell at that price and they observe
 the slope of the true demand curve at that price. With this information they
 estimate a linear demand curve. Given this estimate of the demand curve they
 set a new optimal price. We investigate the dynamical properties of this
 learning process. We find that, if the cross-price effects and the curvature
 of the demand curve are small, prices converge to the Bertrand-Nash
 equilibrium. The global dynamics of this adjustment process are analyzed by
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 numerical simulations. By means of computational techniques and by applying
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
results from homoclinic bifurcation theory we provide evidence for the
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 existence of strange attractors.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  奇怪的吸引因子??


就是上面劃線的部分覺得頗難懂的,跟同學兩人討論來討論去的,不由自主地搞笑起來~XD
(雖然前面的部分也沒全然很了解,但最起碼前面部分的文字"看"得懂~:p)

不知有沒有人看的懂這段文字,能幫忙解惑一下的~thx!!


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 140.119.147.46
推 publius:那這樣，你們的討論結果可不可以提出來貢獻一下:p?
推 daq:好像是CHAOS的東西 去數學板問看看
推 minmax:非線性科學中，分岔，混沌，分維，奇怪吸引子的問題等，都ꐠ
→ minmax:是前景極為廣闊的領域，我很有興趣，尤其是運用於經濟科學렠
→ minmax:上，更是我心嚮往的路，無奈，此技術概念尚未成為主流。礙ꤠ
→ minmax:於某些因素，還是...乖乖做其他傳統的東西。版上，不知是否
→ minmax:有同好？交流一下...。將來，我想我會回到這塊領域。