看板 Economics 關於我們 聯絡資訊
※ 引述《HowLeeHi (想和妳去把把風)》之銘言: : 就在剛剛公佈了 : http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2007/ : 分別是三位美國人 : Leonid Hurwicz : Eric S. Maskin : Roger B. Myerson 請問版上有對機制設計理論熟悉的先進嗎? 我剛才看了一下,這理論大概是設計在個經內類似賽局的模型 大至上是用來推論拍賣,社福跟醫學院學生的管制入學,公共財與最適稅收 好像是設計出一個模式讓結果可以依照設計模型人希望的結果走 有沒有大大可以詳加解釋一下這個模型的意涵,謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.170.174.208
economist:See http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/ 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:41
economist:You can download the article 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:43
economist:"Scientific Background" from the 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:44
economist:press release page of the Nobel 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:44
economist:website. 70.101.72.218 10/16 03:44
expertu:不是醫學院學生的管制入學, 122.126.65.134 10/16 07:55
expertu:是醫學院畢業生和實習工作之間的matching 122.126.65.134 10/16 07:55
dlanod:基本上..就是加上兩條限制式:IR跟IC..其中 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:51
dlanod:IR=Individual Rationality constraint 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:51
dlanod:IC=Incentive Compatibility Constraint 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:52
dlanod:至於模型的細節請見:Contract Theory, by 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:52
dlanod:Patrick Bolton and Mathias Dewatripont 218.171.180.10 10/16 20:53
kk25:可以借轉一下嗎 :p 140.117.177.15 10/16 22:43
kk25:轉錄至看板 NSYSU_ECO96 10/16 22:46
kuromo:1樓的,不回答就算了,你爸媽忘了教你禮儀嗎? 218.170.177.76 10/17 00:42
julesL:economist版友沒必要這樣吧,學術討論版上 61.59.85.136 10/17 02:07
julesL:出現F word 跟人身攻擊不妥吧 61.59.85.136 10/17 02:07
economist:If kuromo felt offended, I apologize.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:48
economist:If you keep reading the webpage, it128.151.210.219 10/17 02:49
economist:says, "they gave you a link to this128.151.210.219 10/17 02:49
economist:site as a JOKE." It has been a pretty128.151.210.219 10/17 02:50
economist:popular joke up here. Finally, my128.151.210.219 10/17 02:50
economist:answer was from line 2 to line 4.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:51
economist:That article on the Nobel website is128.151.210.219 10/17 02:51
economist:comprehensive and helpful.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:52
economist:Kumoro's question is impossible to128.151.210.219 10/17 02:53
economist:answer in limited space on bbs, but128.151.210.219 10/17 02:53
economist:that's all answered in the article I128.151.210.219 10/17 02:53
economist:suggested.128.151.210.219 10/17 02:54
Liaooo:解釋這麼多也沒用,剛看到還是不太高興 1F 61.230.84.246 10/17 22:06
LeChatelier:我倒是覺得沒什麼,或許有的人無法接受 218.170.54.215 10/18 02:04
LeChatelier:西方幽默吧。更何況economist已道歉。 218.170.54.215 10/18 02:09
Papachen:請到此為止~我想雙方都不是有惡意的謝謝 61.62.111.141 10/18 11:35