推 JamesChen:Non stochastic 也可以解釋 10/17 15:06
推 ichibond3:我記得greene的附錄c有證明 10/19 20:14
出處:http://tinyurl.com/ykbawo6
reg lines from economic data often cannot be given a causal interpretation.
The reason being that in the relation of interest between observables
and unobservables we might expect they are correlated, whereas in a
^^^^^^^^^^^^
reg model regressors and unobservables are uncorrelated by construction.
請問黃字文意為何?
y=xb+e
迴歸假設之一： E[xe]=0 為了得到b的認定.
不懂的是為何 E[xe]!=0 會是expect的條件為了casuality的關係？
謝謝^^"
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.86.136
※ bcs:轉錄至看板 Statistics 10/17 14:45