推 washburn:感謝分享. 真是大哉問! 02/23 02:39
來源: FREESTRA 教科書
科目: 國經
問題:
GATT第24條第5款載明「Accordingly, the provisions of this Agreement
shall not prevent [the formation of customs unions and free-trade areas,
provided that] (a) … the duties [with outside parties] shall not on the
whole be higher or more restrictive than the general incidence of the
duties … prior to the formation …」(簡稱WTO criterion)。在目前
Customs Unions (CUs)及Free Trade Areas (FTA)的國際浪潮下,為避免被
「邊緣化」所遭致的損害,相對於此WTO criterion,有所謂的Kemp-Wan rule
及後來的Krishna and Panagariya (2002)的證明,試申論之。
我的想法:
很有趣的題目
給大家參考 XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 125.224.245.246