Re: [文法] 請幫我分析這個子句的結構

[chenzhishun1 (chenzhishun1)]

※ 引述《jetbike (jb)》之銘言：
: 請幫我分析這個 if 子句的結構,
: "Passive" hobbies, like reading or listening to music, are also good,
: if not the health ideal that the more active hobbies are.
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: 在做^^^記號的副詞子句,我看不懂,
: 請幫我分析一下句子的結構.
: (句子是來自網路英語新聞,好像有省略吧,請教教我.)
: 謝謝您 <(..)>


There are two kinds of hobbies.
"Passive hobbies" and "more active hobbies."

The author believes that
"more active hobbies" are ideal for heath.
Therefore to the author,
"the health ideal" is the same thing as "more active hobbies."
She believes that "more active hobbies" are better for the cancer patients.

If the health ideal (i.e. "more active hobbies") is not possible,
passive hobbies (such as reading or listening to music) is also good.

I agree that the author likes to play with sentence structures.
Shifting words back and forth
in the way that can be a little confusing to the readers.

Her original article is here, read it if anyone is interested.
http://tinyurl.com/yhxqgc3

cheers ^^

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 202.169.164.243
→ chenzhishun1:are*
推 jetbike:Thank you very much. The answer is really clear.
→ jetbike:<(..)>
→ jetbike:(The sentence comes from this article right.)