→ dunchee:... would have been (the ... images) of looting 03/30 21:55
→ dunchee:of的這寫法是用於和前頭的寫法對應，同時也算是標明重點/ 03/30 21:56
→ dunchee:主旨是前頭所說的"the images"，而不是looting這行為本身 03/30 21:56
→ home6110:有些懂了，謝謝你。 03/30 23:30
以下這句話的文法我不是很懂:
--> If crushed bodies were the enduring images of Haiti's earthquake,
the most memorable ones of Chile's would have been of looting.
請問: 為什麼要用been of looting. 而不是benn looting.?
感謝解惑。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.131.68.44
※ 編輯: home6110 來自: 220.131.68.44 (03/30 19:20)