[文法]高中文法

[yyuweii (唯)]

  1. I think the space program is too expensive and ___
     we can't afford it.
     (A)X (B)because (C)that (D)unless

     A:(C)  為什麼不能選(A)?

  2. Many other vessels have been lost in this region,
     which included navy ship, Nereus.

     which included有錯嗎?
     為什麼which included 要改成 including?
     可以改成of which included嗎?


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 111.255.47.37
→ noruas:I think that... and that.....
→ noruas:(二句都是that子句~)
→ noruas:2. which 指的是 this region
推 noruas:要改成 including
→ noruas:This region included navy ship, Nereus. 這樣說不對
→ noruas:Many other vessels included navy ship, Nereus. 才對
→ noruas:(因為 navy ship 是屬於 Many other vessels)
→ A1right:如果第一句要選A  那麼是不是把we去掉就好?
→ A1right:I think.. expensive and can't afford it.  Is it right?
推 noruas:把we刪掉..變成the space program can't afford it
→ noruas:(太空計劃支付不起)
→ noruas:正確講應該是"我們付不起".. (付錢的是人,而非太空計畫)
→ dunchee:1. (A)比(C)更適當. 參考:
→ dunchee:http://dunchee.blogspot.com/2010/04/that2.html
→ dunchee:(特別是最後3個例子，或是直接查列在下方的出處)
→ dunchee:2. "including"用的是這個的意思/用法(詞性):
→ dunchee:http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/including
→ dunchee:這的用法來源"有可能"是來自關代用法(reduced relative
→ dunchee:clause)，但是including這時後已經有自己的特定用法/意思
→ dunchee:(比如前頭有人提到的，which included會是另外的意思)
推 zofloya:第一題念過去就覺得A是比較好的答案，什麼鳥題目。還有辦
→ zofloya:法解釋一堆，真的佩服你們。
→ ashurali:including在LDOCE例句仍是和換成which include(s)相同吧
→ ashurali:2.的which～不能說是對前面整句話作補充說明嗎？
推 rogerkid:推樓上~問題在於時態的不一致~而不是意義上有不同
推 noruas:z大為什麼這樣講....不回答就算了,何必酸人
→ noruas:難道Z大覺得大家程度太低  所以態度很不屑嗎?
→ noruas:我覺得 學英文的過程中 難免要歷經一段慘痛期
→ noruas:不管問題再怎麼沒意義  但還是得面對
推 noruas:對於中級程度的問題,就用中級程度能理解的方式去回答
→ noruas:而不是說"題目太爛 不用管它" 這種回答方式,只顯示出傲慢
推 zofloya:很顯然我只針對對第一題"硬"合理化題目的人，不用把"大家"
→ zofloya:扯進來
→ zofloya:還有就是，"沒有意義"的問題，真的不需要面對，共勉之~