作者tengharold (RoadMan_A)
看板Eng-Class
標題Re: [請益] implementation跟introduction
時間Sat Aug 28 02:16:30 2010
※ 引述《xpower50 (37303)》之銘言:
: The police have monitored the number of drink-related accidents
: since the introduction of a ban on drinking and driving in Hong
: Kong.
: Tenancy holders must provide documents to prove that the factory
: existed before the implementation of the redevelopment plan.
: 想請問在這種地方implementation跟introduction可以互換嗎
: 是不是都是代表開始實施的意思 非常謝謝~~~~~
introduction 光看字義未必代表執行
implementation 則一定有執行
第一段 introduction of a ban "禁令"一定有執行,沒執行的禁令不叫禁令,叫禁令草案
(plan/draft/proposal for a ban)
尤其是前面還說警察在監控數據變化
所以一定是警察開始執行後才能監控禁令的效果,不論是用introduction 或
implementation都不會搞不懂到底有沒有執行
所以第一段兩個可以互換,不會造成意義的變化
第二段
Tenancy holders must do X to prove Y before the implementation of Z
譯為 "在實施Z之前tenancy holders 要做 X 來證明 Y"
但如implementation改成introduction
tenancy holders must do X to prove Y before the introduction of Z
解釋成"在Z進入議會受討論之前/在Z被公佈之前/在提出Z之前 tenancy holders ..."
也都ok
代表在此implementation換成introduction意義會變
所以在第二段這兩個字不能互通
以上供大家討論~
--
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to
say something. -Plato (427BC-347BC)
Plato is boring. -Frederich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
Nietzsche was stupid and abnormal. -Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 70.166.3.190
推 xpower50:喔喔~~我了解了 謝謝t大指教:) 08/29 09:24
→ ineedhope:推推~ 08/29 14:33