作者buugua (布瓜)
看板Eng-Class
標題[考題] 很難的克漏字
時間Fri Sep 24 19:51:24 2010
考題:一般
題目:Do oysters have little bivalve souls? Do they dream briny dreams,
scream briny screams? On a level that I suppose is selfish and somewhat silly,
I hope not, because they are alive when they are shucked right 31 us,
their deaths more proximal than those of so many creatures we eat.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
試譯: 它們的死亡比起許多其他我們吃的生物都還要歷歷在目
They don't thrash like the lobster in its scalding pot, but should we
nonetheless worry about how they meet their end?
And whether that end is a sufficiently compassionate one? These questions
seem 32 they once did. Last month Whole Foods, a chain of grocery
stores that promotes organic and natural foods, announced that it
would 33 live lobsters, saying that keeping them in crammed tanks for
long periods doesn't demonstrate a proper concern for animal welfare.
The Chicago City Council recently 34 of foie gras to protest the
force-feeding of the ducks and geese that yield it. California passed a
similar law, which doesn't 35 until 2012, and other states and cities
are considering such measures.
提問:
32. (A) less funny than
(B) less challenging than
(C) less imaginative than
(D) less ridiculous than
Ans:(D)
因為看不太懂這一題的前後文 所以選不出來
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.250.197.210
推 stu60912:these questions 指的是前面兩個 09/24 23:02
→ stu60912:1. 我們不用去擔心他們臨死前是怎麼煎熬的嗎? 09/24 23:03
→ stu60912:2. 他們被烹調的方式(死法)是否已經很仁慈了? 09/24 23:04
→ stu60912:這兩個問題一旦這些oysters 經歷過後,就再也不那麼滑稽 09/24 23:06
→ stu60912:可笑了。況且後面也舉例說有店家站出來說我們對待他們的 09/24 23:07
→ stu60912:保存方式很不人道,所以選(D)是比較呼應前後文。 09/24 23:08
→ stu60912:不選(A)是因為funny是 「用來取悅人的」 (D)則是「引 09/24 23:08
→ stu60912:來嘲笑的」,兩者的意涵不同。B、C的意思就又差更大了 09/24 23:09