→ dunchee:"而不是..... 吧 what怎會是主詞"-> "what"是否是什麼詞 11/23 12:26
→ dunchee:不是由答句來決定的。答句的句型是答句句型,問句的是問句 11/23 12:27
→ dunchee:的句型. 另外就是"XXX is the situation"不是沒有。比如 11/23 12:27
→ dunchee:That is the situation. 11/23 12:28
→ dunchee:"what是主詞"這部分不要想得太鑽.它只是在整句中"看"起來 11/23 12:33
→ dunchee:像是主詞(它本身也是pronoun(或是其它"術語",字典上有: 11/23 12:34
→ dunchee:然後也是疑問詞--和單純的直述句子比較起來它的位置功能 11/23 12:35
→ dunchee:詞性都*像*是主詞(名詞) 就這樣,很單純。剩下的你只是要 11/23 12:36
→ dunchee:熟悉這用法 (文法上有時候不同學者會有不同看法,所以不需 11/23 12:37
→ dunchee:要 *一定得是* XXX文法才可以。很多時候挑一個"方便記"的 11/23 12:37
→ dunchee:文法解釋來幫助你記憶某特定用法就很夠了 11/23 12:38
→ beatrice1009:那請問結論到底哪個用法對? 11/23 15:23
→ beatrice1009:What即使再問句也有當主詞跟受詞補語的差別, 11/23 15:25
→ beatrice1009:請真正了解再來回文好嗎? 11/23 15:25
推 noruas:原波講的沒錯.. 11/23 15:56
→ noruas:What do you think the situation is? 才對 11/23 15:57
→ noruas:What do you think is the situation? 錯誤 11/23 15:57
→ noruas:用簡單的例子來看: 11/23 15:57
→ noruas:What do you think it is? => 正確的講法 11/23 15:58
→ noruas:What do you think is it? => 錯誤 11/23 15:58
→ noruas:另外,關於"分別疑問詞當主詞或受詞" 11/23 15:59
→ noruas:原波大剛好舉了一個非常詭異的例子: Be動詞 11/23 16:00
→ noruas:因為be動詞的構句中,主詞和受詞是可以互換的 11/23 16:01
→ noruas:This is your card. => Your card is this. 11/23 16:02
→ noruas:轉成疑問句: 11/23 16:03
→ noruas:(1) What is my card? This is your card. 11/23 16:04
→ noruas:(2) What is this? This is your card. 11/23 16:04
→ noruas:(What當主詞或受詞,很難就字面上去判斷) 11/23 16:05
→ noruas:但如果是be動詞以外的動詞,就很容易判斷: 11/23 16:05
→ noruas:Who did that? (who當主詞) 11/23 16:06
→ noruas:Who did you see? (who當受詞) 11/23 16:06
推 noruas:但不管what是主詞還是補語.. 11/23 16:08
→ noruas:PS 我上面有打錯..主詞或補語而非主詞或受詞..orz 11/23 16:09
推 cloud7556:原PO這問題應該是龍騰第三冊第七課 11/23 22:48