→ puddingtea:原來我自己中文就寫得有點怪，感謝H大回復~ 11/30 10:18
→ puddingtea:NLFP是我自己做的，而且也用SEM、TEM、XRD鑑定過 11/30 10:18
→ puddingtea:是我自己中文與一的問題~~sorryXD! 11/30 10:18
: 藉由溶劑熱法合成出奈米磷酸鋰鐵粒子，其長約60~90 nm，寬約30~40 nm，為了改善奈米
: 粒子乾燥時聚集現象及磷酸鋰鐵導電度低下的缺點，添加蔗糖、氧化石墨、樹脂等碳源，
: 並於500 度碳化。其產物將由XRD鑑定晶型，TEM、SEM觀察外部型態。
問題之一是動詞時態。你英文都用過去式。表示你想要描述一個已經完成的實驗。但是
中文那邊，『其產物將由XRD鑑定晶型...』，指的是未來才會發生的事，還是
已經鑑定過了？
另外你都用被動語態。在沒有上下文的狀態下，讀者，也就是我啦，看不太出來
NLFP 是你做出來的，還是別人老早就做出來了。以學術寫作而言，『精確』是第一
要務。如果你想要說的是你的成果，就要想辦法不要讓別人誤解。
『並於 500 度碳化』我看不懂是誰要被碳化。
: 英文
: Nanoparticles of lithium iron phosphate (NLFP) with a length of 60 ~ 90 nm,
: width of 30 ~ 40 nm was synthesized by solvothermal method. In order to
Nanoparticles of lithium iron phosphate (NLFP) with length ranging from
60 to 90 nm and width from 30 to 40 nm were synthesized by the
solvo-thermal method. To prevent the potential aggregation and to increase
NLFP's electrical conductivity, sucrose, graphite oxide and resin were
introduced during the synthesis process. The morphological properties
of the products were then identified by XRD, TEM and SEM
: prevent aggregation and improve low electrical conductivity of NLFP, we mixed
: sucrose, graphite oxide and resin and then carbonized at 500 oC. The
: morphology of the product was identified by XRD, TEM and SEM.
: 想請問版上的先進，在英文部分有哪些地方文法錯誤或者不通順的嗎？
※ 編輯: hoch 來自: 120.126.36.193 (11/29 18:20)