→ ladytruth:為什麼不是looked upon as???? 04/12 17:22
推 redvictory:因為是 "被認為是" 04/12 21:17
→ dunchee:這題目本身有問題(網路上可以找到一家大學轉學考考題。選 04/12 21:49
→ dunchee:項大致一樣,只是都是as,即使是如此,題目還是有問題) 04/12 21:50
→ dunchee:*原*出題人我猜是要考這樣子的用法: "is thought to be / 04/12 21:51
→ dunchee:is viewed as / is looked(如果答案真的是這,這個出題人 04/12 21:51
→ dunchee:應該是抄錯) / is regarded as ) 但是問題是這些不是唯一 04/12 21:52
→ dunchee:用法 比如: 04/12 21:52
→ dunchee:(粗黑字部份) (was) .... regarded as -> 字典是有列這" 04/12 21:53
→ dunchee:常用法",但是"(be) regarded to be"也是常用法 參考: 04/12 21:53
→ dunchee:是(出題人本身程度不足的)無厘頭題 04/12 21:58
→ ladytruth:謝謝d大解釋~~了解了 04/14 16:56