作者kswiss11 (kswiss)
看板Eng-Class
標題[文法] 動名詞與不定詞
時間Sat Jul 28 11:57:11 2012
請問這裡前輩們
1.The work of the writer is to define the things that we all know, but cannot say
此句為何不可用for defining???
2.I hate studying math; which is always hard to find the answer
此句which is 為何不可用it is 或 that is 或 I am來代替???
3.There is nothing for it but ____ up the plan
a. give b. to give
a和b哪個對??原因是甚麼??
4.The girl was interested in nothing but _____
a.singing b. to sing c. sing
a b c哪個對??原因是甚麼??
5.The portrait is said to be painted two hundred ago
此句的is said 為何不會因為後面有ago而用was said??
還有 to be painted 為何卻是錯的???
6.He was supposed to be examined by the doctor but in fact he wasn't examined
此句跟上句一樣,後面有by但是用to be examined卻是錯的???
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.195.247
→ pkuguy:is to define的不定詞表示「目地」翻作「為了對～下定義」 07/28 14:05
推 DarkD:翻回中文to V跟for Ving/N依情境都可翻成"為了..","目的為.. 07/28 16:12
推 DarkD:但英文裡的用法不太依樣，文法上沒錯，只是沒有人那樣用 07/28 16:14
推 DarkD:2. 我會用it is或that is，I am完全不通.. 07/28 16:18
→ DarkD:3. b. 一種固定說法。nothing but是常見的表達 07/28 16:22
→ DarkD: 這邊只是其中一種固定形式 07/28 16:22
→ DarkD:4. a. 同上，另一種形式，這邊nothing but可直接看成only 07/28 16:23
→ DarkD:5. is said (by people)，was said不一定錯，看情況，譬如: 07/28 16:26
→ DarkD:was said的話意思會變成: 以前那畫鑑定為200年前，但現在不 07/28 16:27
→ DarkD:一樣了 07/28 16:27
→ DarkD:5. 第二個問題不懂..?? 可能你漏打?two hundred "years" ago 07/28 16:29
→ DarkD:6. 不懂 07/28 16:30