→ ewayne:因為這種戰術在18,19世紀"持續、多次"運用 03/03 22:26
→ ewayne:並且這是在講二戰的日軍，用have會變成是講現代，但現代應 03/03 22:31
→ ewayne:該沒有任何步兵部隊會做刺刀衝鋒XD 03/03 22:32
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_were_some_of_Japan's_military_tactics
On a smaller scale, Japanese Army tactics were rather old fashioned
throughout the war, not to say they weren't effective initially. They favored
shock charges that could break the enemy line through sheer force, in the
"spirit of the bayonet," the way wars had been fought in the 19th and 18th
century.
請教這裡為什麼會用had been fought...而不是 were fought or have been fought?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.173.167.244