[文法] could be v-ed...would?

[chevalierxd (獨孤求噓-風青羊)]

However, the KMT insists that a special military court be established under
the Ministry of Justice since expertise on military affairs would be required
for prosecutors and judges who handle such cases, Lai said.

為什麼不能用being established?

我的想法是從would之前都是一個子句

這樣不行嗎?

感謝回答~

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.31.135.68
→ dunchee:"我的想法是...."--> 有多個子句
→ dunchee:the KMT insists(主要子句) that+(that引導的子句) ...
→ dunchee:since (since引導的子句) ....
→ dunchee:http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/insist
→ dunchee:http://alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxsubjun.html
→ dunchee:特別是 (4) 裡頭有提到 insist
推 racklit7000:因為一開始的動詞insist，S+insist... ,S+（should）+
推 racklit7000:原形動詞
喔喔 所以如果前面假設是DECLARE的話 是不是就應該要用BEING?
※ 編輯: chevalierxd     來自: 61.31.135.68         (08/11 03:44)
推 racklit7000:這樣的話，文法架構變得很怪