[考題] 高中

[ambrosio (...)]

1 There is ______.
  B) a rumor that a flying saucer was seen last night
  C) an explanation why the plane crashed

答案是B，但C錯在哪兒?百思不得其解

2 Mr. Wang was the manager ____ interviewed me for this job.
  C) , who  D) who

答案是C，如果那家公司有二個經理以上，D是不是也可以阿

3 ____ to argue with Barry; he is very stubborn.
  C) There is no use to try
  D) There is not much use trying

答案是D，這有固定用法嗎，C 我唸起來也很順@@

4 ___ about the potential danger of using unclear energy, they are calling
  on scientists to develop renewable forms of energy.
  B) Worrying
  C) Worried
答案是C，但我查過字典，Don't worry about the matter, take it easy.有Vi的
用法，所以B是不是也可以?

5 If Sue accepted Kenny's proposal last year, they ___ married for
  three months tomorrow.
  D) would have been

這一題我我用排錯選的，因為其它答案都很離譜，但我不是很了解這個用法。
是否有其它形式的寫法，例如，~had accepted~，they would be ~
                        或 ~had accepted~, they will have been ~等等

感激不盡，叩謝各位大大

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.143.200.153
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1398127668.A.387.html
推 enthusiasm:第1題的C選項，應該要 "an explanation for why the
→ enthusiasm:plane crashed 才對，要加 for
推 Serphi:2.不行，要選B的話是 XX was "the"  manager who .........
→ ambrosio:對不起，我少打the，我改一下Orz
※ 編輯: ambrosio (220.143.200.153), 04/22/2014 09:45:20
→ Serphi:3. 選C是 There is no use "trying" to argue
→ ambrosio:呃，你拿答案來回答我的問題?你的意思是這是慣用語?
推 Serphi:我沒學過文法，但就是沒有你說的這種用法
推 Serphi:4. 不行
推 Serphi:5.沒其他寫法，要用would be你要敘述現代的事情才行
→ ambrosio:謝謝你，那請問if子句用，had accepted可以嗎
推 vicario837:It's no use crying over spilt milk.賣牛奶女孩的故事
→ vicario837:這句背起來 以後碰到no use的題都會解了 要用不定詞
→ vicario837:要改成 It's useless to cry...
推 comeandgo:第二題個人以為兩個都ok 意思不同而已
推 comeandgo:第四題，兩種用法意思不一樣，I worry about you 是指
推 comeandgo:事實，I'm worried about you , 是只當下的情況，此題針
→ comeandgo:對某件事情故選worried
→ ambrosio:第四題的解釋，聽不太懂，我給的字典例句不也是針對某件
→ ambrosio:事情嗎@@
推 tom91002:5. would have這個句型是與現在事實相反的假設用法
→ tom91002:4. worry about跟be worried about兩種用法，意思有點不
→ tom91002:   太相同。前者是敘述一種普遍、長期的現象，例如
→ tom91002:   "Parents worry about their children even if they
→ tom91002:   grow up"；而後者比較用來敘述一個特定的事件，例如
→ tom91002:   "The students protesting against the trade
→ tom91002:   agreement with China are worried that the
推 comeandgo:would have 應該是與過去事實相反的假設喔，would 才是
→ comeandgo:與現在事實相反的假設
→ tom91002:   president would ignore people's voice and have the
→ tom91002:   law passed"。意思有些微的不一樣。
→ tom91002:對，謝謝comeandgo更正。
推 comeandgo:不過第五題我自己以為應該要用had accepted 才對 @@
→ ambrosio:請問既然是與過去事實相反，後面為什麼會接tomorrow?
推 comeandgo:have 視為完成式動詞，要到明天才滿三個月
→ tom91002:這不衝突吧？「如果我大一大二時沒有沉迷社團，我下個月
→ tom91002:就可以順利畢業而不會延畢了。」
→ ambrosio:嗯，大概了解了，感恩~
推 clydechen:2.有無逗號都對 但在此唯指一位姓王的經理 沒有其他姓
→ clydechen:王的來面試他 故字句為非限定修飾所以要加逗號
→ clydechen:3.it is no use ving / it is useless to v / it is of
→ clydechen: no use to v
→ dunchee:5. 題目少了 had -- 和過去事實相反(由last year點出)要搭
→ dunchee:配 had accepted。had不能省
→ dunchee:（和subjunctive有關的）「字樣」上呈現"would have p.p."
→ dunchee:不是只有「和過去事實相反」。和現在(/未來)事實相反的也
→ dunchee:有: they will have been married for three months
→ dunchee:tommorow. (indicative)
→ dunchee:-> they would have been married for three months
→ dunchee:tomorrow. (subjunctive)
→ dunchee:這裡的"have been married"是和for three months配合的「
→ dunchee:持續一段時間」的完成式
→ dunchee:真的要用If Sue accepted ...(這時候「不是」subjunctive)
→ dunchee:那麼後頭搭配的其實是will have been married .. tomorrow
→ dunchee:但是這樣子的出題沒太大意義(所以我才說題目漏了 had, 應
→ dunchee:該是考subjunctive)
→ dunchee:一個"合適"的(indicative)例子: http://ppt.cc/ZSLq
→ dunchee:1. C 也對 http://ppt.cc/Cmmv  CJ 的回答品質不錯
→ ambrosio:thanks ^^