Fw: [閒聊] 建中英文學資例句錯誤

[sitifan ()]

※ [本文轉錄自 teaching 看板 #1HQyEEIo ]

作者: sitifan () 看板: teaching
標題: [閒聊] 建中英文學資例句錯誤
時間: Mon Apr 15 17:08:28 2013

It raining heavily, the children couldn't play outside.

Is the above sentence acceptable?
----------------------------------------------------
No, you can't use impersonal "it" like that.
Where "it" refers to something, you sometimes can. "I tried on a jumper. It
being too big, I didn't buy it." (Terrible example, but grammatical).
-----------------------------------------------------------
As an NES but not a teacher:

Not really. It sounds very similar to the "Thai-speak" that I regularly hear
over here.

I would have phrased it: "It was raining so heavily that the children
couldn't play outside."

Hope this helps
R21
--------------------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/bvq2pua

--
※ 編輯: sitifan         來自: 163.30.191.253       (04/16 14:21)

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: sitifan (114.25.35.97), 08/15/2014 17:39:53
→ tengharold: It [be 動詞] raining，是原句忽略還是原 po 打錯？
推 tindersticks: 這是獨立分詞構句。省去連接詞，動詞改分詞，而主
→ tindersticks: 詞因為前後句不同所以不可省略。不能說這文法錯，
→ tindersticks: 但用得不好就不是很自然。
推 tucson: 符合文法規則不代表就是對的 如果母語人氏不這樣講
→ tucson: 就算是合[文法規則 那還是一樣是錯的
→ tucson: 本句如果有上下文且唷在it之後加上being則可能可以被接受