[Ask ] about the rules

[stool (要死了)]

* This board is designed for the purpose of free chatting in English.

  It is NOT a board to ask questions on English grammar, sentence structure,

  translations etc. For any questions that you may have with regard to your

  English homework or studies, please refer to the board Eng-Class.

==============================================================================


that's the one under disupte


I just tried to execute the rule without thinking. The reason why the ex-board
managers set this rule was to avoid people keeping asking questions on homework
rather than chatting. It's really hard to know if the question is from the h
omework or not. So the easiest way is to ban on asking Eng question...

But outofdejavu is also right to the point that the rule will kill some
discussions also. We are facing kind of a dilemma now.

Should we cancel this rule or give it some amendment?

I'm welcome any suggestion about the rule.

Is there anyone else who has any opinions?
Please post your opinions here.



btw, it's not my duty to deal with the articles posted before i took over
this board. It's impossible for me to read more than 4000 articles
to check if any of them was violated the rule. And the article 3974 was
posted one month ago, i wont take any action unless more boardmates consider
it to be annoying.

thanks for all the comments anyway :)


PEACE!!



--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.68.119.163
→ outofdejavu:the posting 3974 already drained away in the past
→ outofdejavu:I just can't get it why the ex-ruler didn't delete
→ outofdejavu:it or forbid futhur comments by ! it...= =
→ outofdejavu:anyway, I hope this board can be flourished by
→ outofdejavu:more participation...not just Intr postings...
→ stool:me too :)   thanks for the advice
推 ninicole:i think homework questions shouldn't post here XD
→ skyboy:and how abt to create a group M of MSN??
※ 編輯: stool           來自: 64.186.207.237       (06/12 05:02)
推 warren760121:[e-mail]
→ warren760121:up floor is wrong,sorry.
推 colleenyaya:[e-mail]
→ love5397:http://bit.ly/gsEwcK
推 kent1021:no question about english grammar or vocabulary
→ kent1021:be asked, but if regarding to the grammar mistake or
→ kent1021:better vocabulary suggestion, i think it is ok for us
→ kent1021:to discuss
→ ridosa:http://tinyurl.com/4zbxt6c
→ keinlin:Hey, is there any word limitation for the post?
推 xinsunzhong:[e-mail] (MSN)
→ MerJ:skype: luneshih . online chat for practice speaking. :)
→ conference:Wat will it be if i break the rule unpurposely?