remko@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> Synopsis: mount(8): mount -t tmpfs does not follow 'size' option
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-fs
> Responsible-Changed-By: remko
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jun 21 09:45:21 UTC 2009
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> reassign to fs team
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135710
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Quoting Peter Snyder in "tmpfs: A Virtual Memory File System", in which
he details the design for Solaris tmpfs, which served as the foundation
for NetBSD's tmpfs, which was in turn integrated into FreeBSD:
"Instead of allocating a fixed amount of memory for exclusive use as a
file system, tmpfs file system
size is dynamic depending on use, allowing the system to decide the
optimal use of memory."
And from the FreeBSD tmpfs(5) man page, "*size* - maximum size (in
bytes) for the file system", note the use of the word "maximum" versus
say, "initial". I would attempt to actually populate/fill the created
file system, and unless it returns as being full with less than the size
specified worth of data, I believe the behavior observed is as intended.
-Nathanael
_______________________________________________
freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"