看板 FB_bugs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
>Number: 137800 >Category: kern >Synopsis: -CURRENT on sparc64 immediate "panic: mtx_init: mtx_lock not aligned for turnstile chain: 0xc06489f8" >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Aug 15 16:10:01 UTC 2009 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Nathaniel Filardo >Release: -CURRENT >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD hydra.priv.oc.ietfng.org 8.0-CURRENT-200906 FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT-200906 #0: Thu Jun 11 15:23:43 UTC 2009 root@araz.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 >Description: SVN r196226 added ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD to check that values could be atomically loaded. On sparc64, _ALIGN() masks off 0xF but the compiler seems to think that the alignment requirement is only 0x7 as printing "&( ((struct foo *)(NULL))->...)" for each of a,b,c,d,e,f in "struct foo { long a; char b; long c; void *d; char e; void *f; };" seems to produces "0 8 16 24 32 40" I don't know what the right fix is or even which one is in error. Thoughts? >How-To-Repeat: Build a kernel on sparc64 later than r196226. It is unclear to me if other details of kernel configuration matter. >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"