xaphod@freebsd.co.uk writes:
> A lot of my current fears stem from the current state of 5. I run 5.1
> on my desktop, laptop and servers. I know 5 is not rated for server
> use, but I evaluate each RELEASE on a case by case basis. In testing
> 5.0 I discovered it has issues, so I didn't use it. Whereas 5.1 was
> perfectly stable. So I started using it. Looking at 5.2, without
> testing it on any of my boxes as yet, my perception is that it's a bit
> flaky.
On the contrary, 5.2 is (in my experience) far more stable than 5.1,
and a lot of work has gone into ACPI support and interrupt routing to
make 5.2 run better on laptops and high-end servers.
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"