On Saturday 06 March 2004 03:19, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> Chris Pressey said on Mar 5, 2004 at 19:22:00:
> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 02:55:35 +0100
> >
> > Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> wrote:
> > > Daniela wrote:
> > > > I like doing AI programming, that's numbercrunching most of the time.
> > > >
> > > > A compiler can't, for example, know whether you need to have zero
> > > > returned from the atoi() function when the user entered nonsense. If
> > > > you don't need to check whether the user has entered a valid number,
> > > > you can do it *much* faster.
> > >
> > > Excellent example. Here you're limited by the speed of the fingers of
> > > the user who's entering the data, so there's *absolutely no point* in
> > > optimising the atoi() function in this way. (Or if you're reading from
> > > the disk, the disk I/O will be the bottleneck, though it's admittedly
> > > faster than fingers.)
> >
> > I don't understand your point... atoi() is not an I/O function.
>
> Where did the "a" in the "atoi" come from?
>
> The point is that some very slow i/o routine gives you an ascii string
> (that's the only reason you'd ever need to deal with an ascii string),
> and then the C library's atoi() converts that to an integer. Now,
> what's the advantage of optimising atoi()?
It was just an example.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"