看板 FB_chat 關於我們 聯絡資訊
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Chris Pressey probably wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:31:04 +0400 > Sergey Zaharchenko <doublef@tele-kom.ru> wrote: > >=20 > > If I take out every word about main() from C's specification (making > > it an ordinary function), will the resulting `language' stay > > Turing-complete? >=20 > Not AFAIK. >=20 > > If not, why? >=20 > You no longer have a start state. >=20 What if I add `The function with the same name as the executable starts the program's execution like main() does in C'? --=20 DoubleF Decision maker, n.: The person in your office who was unable to form a task force before the music stopped. --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAkG+Lwo7hT/9lVdwRAvTQAJ0f6cSKEIkPLrJnwJnlUtVQx7O6/wCcDhG5 q0DpeZUjUNfAVbHvUbbUie0= =Xl9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--