Re: Public Access to Perforce?

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 03:23:04PM -0400, David Rhodus wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:09:24 -0700, Kris Kennaway <[e-mail]> w=
rote:
> >=20
> > Hey, it was your silly argument to begin with.
>=20
> No, I was just following up on someone else's post that wanted the
> perforce development work to be available for public download because
> I think that it should too and that anything else would just not be
> the correct thing for fbsd to do.  Crescent Anchor is a commercial
> company, not an open source project, though there are several
> employees that work there which develop on open source projects as
> their full time job.

So you'd be happy if we changed the name of the FreeBSD perforce repo
to - say - LibreBSD, and charged people for access?  This would bring
it in line with the DragonFly/FireFly model.

Of course, this would clearly be a step backwards from the situation
as it exists now with FreeBSD, which again points out how silly (dare
I say hypocritical) your argument is.

Kris

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBI64BWry0BWjoQKURAi4OAKCaHfnF2j1Xg6ZjkLGC38aUMNmqBACgxNrs
gw8yyHs3RLjRhk/Qy2gJlu8=
=5qSl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--