Quoting Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org>:
> man -M . foo1.man should work (assuming FBSDs man command is POSIX
> compliant; I haven't tried it).
So try it then. (Hint: it doesn't. However, if you have a
subdirectory man1 in your current working directory, and foo.1
inside that directory, then man -M . foo works. Again, try telling
a naive user that.)
> No need for GNU, and the emphasis over
> the last few years is less gnu in the base system, not more.
I have news for you: it's *already* GNU man, but an ancient version.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"