This doesn't belong on Questions or Hackers.
On Jul 8, 2005, at 6:28 PM, R. Tyler Ballance wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> i'll be meeting tuesday with staffers for my congressman (since
> he's still in D.C.) to discuss software patents and the "evil"
> behind them.
There is absolutely nothing inherently evil about so-called "software
patents." If an invention has honestly been made then it makes no
difference whatsoever if its implemented in software or with gears
and levers, the inventor deserves protection.
The problem lies with the Patent Office for issuing patents for prior
art. Funniest example I know of is "Method of Exercising a Cat"
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5443036.html. Its a laser pointer.
Who hasn't played with a cat using a flashlight or mirror before
laser pointers were invented?
Another example is that the Patent Office used to new patents for old
technology simply because the new claim specified a 10" disk drive
rather than 12". This silliness was mostly resolved between 5-1/4"
and 3-1/2".
--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net
========================================================================
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"