Jan Grant wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, deeptech71@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>
>> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>> On 2007-03-25 01:36, deeptech71@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>>>> FreeBSD's UFS2 already uses 96bit timestamps, where 64 bits are used
>>>>> for seconds and 32 bits are used for nanoseconds. Is that sufficient
>>>>> for you?
>>>> What the hell for?
>>> ``Just because it can.''
>> Good. :] 2x64bit for x64?
>
> To measure what? Even at nanosecond resolution, the notion of
> timestamping an event seems a little arbitrary. Much beyond it and it's
> not clear exactly what you're "measuring" - or even if there is any
> physical interpretation.
>
>
Yeah exactly, something's just redunant.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"