---559023410-959030623-1257200375=:8706
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> 2009/11/2 KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu>:
>
>> It looks to me it is talking about "operators" i.e. government buearocra=
ts
>> on state systems talking about "personal data" which just means that the
>> government has records on you.
>
> No, an "operator" is essentially anyone who processes data - Art. 3
> =C2=A72, but I still don't see where the leap to "certified OS" is made..=
=2E
That is what I was looking at.. and from the use of "operator" in the rest=
=20
of the text, it seems it is mostly about the rights of a person regarding=
=20
a second party processing their data in some state data system. The first=
=20
definition of operator under Article three is "a State authority,=20
municipal authority, .." it seems to imply that it is concerned about=20
what happens to folks' personal data when it gets into the state (or=20
other, granted) system..
I agree.. I didn't quite read it down to the letter.. it is like 15 pages,=
=20
but I tried to read most of it.
A key definition for this particular worry is Article 3 9)..
personal data information system - an information system, consisting of=20
all the personal data kept in a database, and also the information=20
technologies and hardware, enabling processing of such personal data using=
=20
automated facilities or without the use of such facilities.
In Article 13 # 2
2. Federal Laws may establish special features of keeping records of=20
personal data in State or municipal personal data information systems,=20
including the use of various means of indicating that personal data=20
included in the corresponding State or municipal data information system=20
belong to a particular subject of personal data.
Now that sounds to me talking about some beaurocrats dealing with folks=20
coming into a government office.. and they are talking about what the=20
government is doing with their data.
Now the definition of operator does extend beyond "state and municipal,"=20
this is true.. umm.. but the spirit of all this..
Yeah.. Not seeing anybody needing to worry about their FBSD. This=20
legislation looks to be on the citizen's side, in my estimation.. not=20
trying to regulate anything but folks who are authorized to snoop into=20
other folks' data.. er.. they talk about privacy somewhere.. but I am not=
=20
going to try to cite any more Articles just now.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Igor
>
*----------------------------------------------------------*
Kayven Riese, BSCS, MS (Physiology and Biophysics)
(415) 902 5513 cellular
http://kayve.net
Webmaster http://ChessYoga.org
*----------------------------------------------------------*
---559023410-959030623-1257200375=:8706
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
---559023410-959030623-1257200375=:8706--