This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig31133FF51135CCAF03404C95
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The FreeBSD os comparison[0] mentioned in the subject line is woefully
out of date. Where would I go to bug someone about a newer one? I'm
telling a (relatively) minted geek friend of mine who wants benchmarks
and stats on FreeBSD vs. Windows XP (and when 7 is supposedly ready for
prime time, that too).
Keeping something like this up-to-date is definitely would make it a
good talking point (with such marketing comparisons kept archived for
reference) for FreeBSD advocacy.
[0]: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
--=20
PIT
--------------enig31133FF51135CCAF03404C95
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLWKx8AAoJEENZQ8DH7rW0eNAH/20EjzkL9k0WHbIOlDVsp7JM
KlxTmkjlH19ymFoEETRJNa3YVVq6SoOn1Wc3ytepXKuu/Sm27EF22lTINJryMjgn
2sRPKMsPwfpMLTXWtrKFstU5S1x0MowY9FDwqP+kOG1i6apHkSRd9T9x3iI2Q4nA
y5KZhKn03790tNjIKlPB/MY0mCaSnmVxxzi2vJCz8K9Uc5CUABwSxvULGL8VUAlQ
GtbJ9SpgvKYt2gxfpd+AE3zOg5WjJPZlciA/TzrxesRKY4Yj2xvYtJtPSK3JJMPn
bPYPa8hvzuAH2Rlj7t0kYOZi/8GTk2qE/w1emKHPrnLMmC60YKUlEiyj6yyKI3A=
=DGlP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig31133FF51135CCAF03404C95--