Re: ZFS ATA vs. ZFS CAM ATA performance on 8.1

--Sig_/ZaeGB8.kWJhdnsiK_tf1CwC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:41:51 +0000
Alexander Best <[e-mail]> wrote:

> hi there,
>=20
> i just stumpled upon this article over at phoronix which benchmarks
> ZFS ATA vs. ZFS CAM ATA on freebsd 8.1 [1]. it seems read
> performance is really low when CAM ATA is enabled. i remember
> phoronix being famous for posting stupid benchmarks (RELASE vs.
> HEAD and such). however their benchmark results in this example
> seem to be valid.
>=20
> any comments on that? has performance of ATA CAM increased in HEAD?
> would a UFS2+S+SUJ ATA vs. UFS2+S+SUJ CAM ATA also show equal
> results?

Not sure about any speed increases with ATA_CAM, but I for one
controller I have in this system I did get a massive boost and a end
to annoying disk issues with AHCI.

--Sig_/ZaeGB8.kWJhdnsiK_tf1CwC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkxYpIoACgkQC1tfcMGJid6qJACgqtHdeABJaYRdzfx5hW3L9xFk
9J4An36x90+Y1tNoLBJF+3l7NokkJ4DW
=U6be
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/ZaeGB8.kWJhdnsiK_tf1CwC--