------=_NextPart_000_0393_01CDC0EB.88EC7DA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, your bat crap crazy :-)
All of these variants inherit from the same unified BSD 4.4 base code as =
far
as I know. So years ago there were reasons that groups wanted to spilt =
off
and focus on specific goals. Some of these goals are mutually exclusive.
These BSD variants are not really competing with each other or Linux for
that matter.=20
Justin Mayes=A0
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-misc@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-misc@openbsd.org] On Behalf =
Of
Robin Bj=F6rklin
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:38 PM
To: users@dragonflybsd.org; netbsd-users@netbsd.org;
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Unified BSD?
Hi!
First and foremost I'd like to present myself, I'm a young and naive =
junior
sys admin that think people should be able to compromise and see the =
bigger
picture and the good of the cause.
Now over to the reason for my post.
As all of you probably know there's a lot of buzz around Gnu/Linux these
days and I'm pretty sure you couldn't care less. What I'm wondering is =
why
the BSD community which from what I can gather isn't as big as the Linux
community have decided to split their resources into several different
projects/forks/distributions. To me it seems *BSD would be in a more
competitive shape if all developers would get in under one roof?
Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four =
largest
BSD variants out there, take the best bits and pieces out of each and =
create
a Unified BSD?
Kind Regards,
Robin Bjorklin
------=_NextPart_000_0393_01CDC0EB.88EC7DA0--