On 2012-11-16, at 5:52 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt@update.uu.se> wrote:
> On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD <freebsd@hub.org> wrote:
>>> =
>>> Actually, according to what we are tracking at http://bsdstats.org, the=
re are currently *8*:
>>> =
>>> PC-BSD
>>> FreeBSD
>>> PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD)
>>> DesktopBSD
>>> OpenBSD
>>> NetBSD
>>> DragonflyBSD
>>> MidnightBSD
>>> =
>> =
>> Tracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a
>> long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be
>> same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums
>> doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs
>> (Open/Net/Free/Dfly).
> =
> I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. There=
is no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no matter how many =
systems were installed.
> =
> And I also do happen to consider OS-X to be a BSD system. :-)
I agree on that point, which is why I run it for my desktops =85 but until =
you mention it, I'd never thought of even trying to get the script to run =
=85 have to play with that this weekend and see how "out of the box" it wor=
ks, if it does =85
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"