看板 FB_current 關於我們 聯絡資訊
If this was to be extended with cached global syscall information like = gettimeofday, would we want that to be in a separate page that is marked = non-executable? Is there any way to trick the kernel into leaking = arbitrary (and thus executable) code? Also, would it matter for jails? = Per-process info like getpid would obviously have to be a separate = per-process page. Scott On Jun 14, 2011, at 10:08 AM, K. Macy wrote: > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/sys/imgact.h >=20 > kib added rudimentary support for this in January >=20 > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> = wrote: >> there were discussions at some point on an imprecise but >> fast implementations of gettimeofday() that would not require >> a system call (perhaps mmapping some memory region which >> is opportunistically updated). >>=20 >> Does anyone remember what happened about that ? >>=20 >> Otherwise, is there any place in the kernel where i can fetch >> a struct timeval which is not off by more than, say 1 tick ? >>=20 >> cheers >> luigi >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"