Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly

Hi,

Sounds good to me.  The tmpfs(5) man page should be patched also.

--
Craig Rodrigues
[e-mail]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:31 AM, David O'Brien <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Does anyone object to this patch?
>
> David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two
> years with no problems.
>
> I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on
> TMPFS either.
>
>
> Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tmpfs_vfsops.c      (revision 221113)
> +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c      (working copy)
> @@ -155,9 +155,6 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp)
>                return EOPNOTSUPP;
>        }
>
> -       printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental "
> -           "feature in FreeBSD.\n");
> -
>        vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY);
>        error = VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred);
>        VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0);
>
> --
> -- David  ([e-mail])
> _______________________________________________
> [e-mail] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"
>



-- 
Craig Rodrigues
[e-mail]
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"