看板 FB_current 關於我們 聯絡資訊
--a0hUfxJ20zFHaLM9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Does anyone object to this patch? >=20 > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two > years with no problems. >=20 > I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on > TMPFS either. >=20 >=20 > Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 221113) > +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c (working copy) > @@ -155,9 +155,6 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp) > return EOPNOTSUPP; > } > =20 > - printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental " > - "feature in FreeBSD.\n"); > - > vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY); > error =3D VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred); > VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0); The things I am aware of: - there is a races on the lookup. They were papered over in r212305, but the bug was not really fixed, AFAIR. - the tmpfs does double-buffering for the mapped vnodes. This is quite insulting for the memory-backed fs, isn't it ? I have a patch, but it is still under review. - I believe Peter Holm has more test cases that fails with tmpfs. He would have more details. I somewhat remember some panic on execve(2) the binary located on tmpfs. Removing the warning will not make the issues coming away. --a0hUfxJ20zFHaLM9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4DoGEACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4j9wwCg0V37VuQUw5heAl/Z/iAlO+h0 SmAAoJf/+BF533SS0hUjGsscsSAqUApX =5GKO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a0hUfxJ20zFHaLM9--