看板 FB_current 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 07/07/2011 22:08, Steve Kargl wrote: > 4BSD kernel gives for N = Ncpu + 1. > > 34 processes: 6 running, 28 sleeping > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME CPU COMMAND > 1417 kargl 1 71 0 370M 294M RUN 0 1:30 79.39% sasmp > 1416 kargl 1 71 0 370M 294M RUN 0 1:30 79.20% sasmp > 1418 kargl 1 71 0 370M 294M CPU2 0 1:29 78.81% sasmp > 1420 kargl 1 71 0 370M 294M CPU1 2 1:30 78.27% sasmp > 1419 kargl 1 70 0 370M 294M CPU3 0 1:30 77.59% sasmp > ULE kernel gives for N = Ncpu + 1. > > 34 processes: 6 running, 28 sleeping > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME CPU COMMAND > 1318 kargl 1 103 0 370M 294M CPU0 0 1:31 100.00% sasmp > 1319 kargl 1 103 0 370M 294M RUN 1 1:29 100.00% sasmp > 1322 kargl 1 99 0 370M 294M CPU2 2 1:03 87.26% sasmp > 1320 kargl 1 91 0 370M 294M RUN 3 1:07 60.79% sasmp > 1321 kargl 1 89 0 370M 294M CPU3 3 1:06 55.18% sasmp I can confirm this. Look at the priorities column for the two cases. For some reason (CPU affinity?) the loads get asymmetrical on ULE. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"