--t3wCcZxwnWQbJWrM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much
> >>reason to bump on HEAD right now.
>=20
> Many thanks.
>=20
> >Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD. For now we will
> >need to keep our backward-compatibility patch anyway, and when the
> >bump happens on stable/8 our sysctl comparison will identify 900039 as
> >new ABI.
>=20
> We cannot survive without a bump in HEAD before 9.0 release,
> but we do not need bump immediately.
Right, the point is that you can just say 'do not use 9.0-current
earlier then r223966', and check only for >=3D 8025XX, where XX is the
bump at MFC.
>=20
> So far the condition for new API will be
>=20
> if ( (osreldate >=3D 900040)
> || ((osreldate >=3D 803000) && (osreldate < 900000)))
>=20
> Of course, when MFC will bump revision, the 803000 constant
> will change (probably to 802509).
>=20
> Petr
--t3wCcZxwnWQbJWrM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAk4cwyQACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4ijWwCg5tbkrkKTj6AWRwHoNUjA++Co
TVoAoMEjk2Hk8pafGLB/aKKFJP6M0wM8
=bIEd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--t3wCcZxwnWQbJWrM--