Re: Identification of HTT cores on newer (CPUID leaf 11) Intel

On Sep 14, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:

> on 14/09/2011 20:59 Andrew Boyer said the following:
>> When FreeBSD examines the CPU topology using CPUID leaf 11 in
>> topo_probe_0xb(), it never sets hyperthreading_cpus.  At the end of
>> topo_probe_0x4() it sets hyperthreading_cpus =3D cpu_logical.
>>=20
>> Adding that assignment to line 316 of sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c =
seems to
>> do the right thing on a system with two quad-core E5620 CPUs.  The =
APIC IDs
>> that appear when SMT is enabled in the BIOS get marked AP/HT.
>>=20
>> Do you agree?
>=20
> I agree, but...
> But see this:
> =
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers/44007/focus=3D44024=

>=20
> Someone long ago has decided that new HTT is not the same as old HTT =
and that
> some rules that apply to old HTT should not apply to new HTT.  Even =
the name.
> I think that that's not correct.
> But it doesn't seem that I am able to engage into a discussion the =
person who
> made that decision.  Also I can not find any other interested =
developer either.
>=20
> Anyway, hyperthreading_cpus variable is useless beyond dmesg =
cosmetics.
> And I don't think that any of my changes affected the dmesg output.
>=20
> In my "avgBSD" I have different SMP topology code, but it's not ready =
yet to be
> submitted for merge into the main tree.
>=20
> --=20
> Andriy Gapon


Actually, it's not useless.  If you don't set it to something other than =
zero the machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable doesn't do anything, =
since it can't tell which CPUs are actually HTT.

-Andrew

--------------------------------------------------
Andrew Boyer	[e-mail]




_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"