看板 FB_current 關於我們 聯絡資訊
I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI really think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software, imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev, libprop and libdevattr from dragonfly bsd. Am i missing a point or is this in contradiction witch any of freebsd objectives? Let me know your thoughts... _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"