Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/asterisk14 Makefile

On 11/7/2011 4:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Given that we already have 1.6 and 1.8 in ports, what's the value of
> having this much older version?
>
> I didn't hear one single request to spare it when I deprecated it many
> months ago, and it's been completely gone for over 3 weeks now. Have
> users been asking for it to be returned?

There is a reason why Digium still makes security releases of that 
software. And we still have 1.0 and 1.2 in the tree, so why not 1.4? 
IMHO, 1.4 should stay at least until 1.0 and 1.2 get booted.

I know at least few other companies that use 1.4 heavily and if you take 
just Sippy Software we have around 100 production installations that use 
1.4 around the globe, so you have a very motivated maintainer.

Yes, we can keep it in our private tree, but I am pretty sure there is 
somebody out there who can benefit from this as well.

-Maxim
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"