2011/12/27 Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org>:
> Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto:
>
>>> It's not... but there's no need to specify LICENSE_FILE for a known
>>> licence.
>>
>>
>> Right, so perhaps this line should be dropped completely, not just
>> commented
>> out. =A0On a related note, thanks for removing LICENSE_FILE knobs for kn=
own
>> standard licenses, we need to cure this abuse for quite a while.
>
>
> Well, actually the license framework documentation says exactly the
> opposite, it recommends to set LICENSE_FILE also for known licenses.
Oh dear.... reading bsd.licenses.mk shows that there's no 'pool' of
known licenses, which means that doing stuff like LICENSE=3DGPLv2
without LICENSE_FILE violates the GPL.
I'll look at making a 'pool', now where to store it...
Chris
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"