--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Doug,
Doug Barton wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what is different/better about this than our
> already-existing ed?
I have forwarded this question to the person who asked me to add this,
but got no clear response yet. As far as I can tell, it's a reasonable
attempt at a POSIX/BSD-compatible ed. It lacks some of our more exotic
features (such as -x), but seems pretty compatible. And then of course
they slapped an info page and a GPLv3 licence on it.
Actually, I don't really see the benifit of this port. But there was
a request for it and it seemed like little effort to maintain it ;)
Ciao,
Johan
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iF4EAREIAAYFAk8EGpcACgkQAEpMHW8nCPToUQEAlYBF/us06mZPL7GfOuBKOh7i
F5ZkBB49ArK+sw3ZHbcBAKnLiMUnS3hlJYzO06Q38dX5LpUGGIoarvrPSJb5BB1Q
=O8e4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--