On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:23:38AM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Actually, I don't really see the benefit of this port. But there was
> a request for it and it seemed like little effort to maintain it ;)
Per quoted above, it should not be added. Contrary to GNU versions of sed
and awk, if base ed(1) can be used as drop-in replacement, over-populating
ports collection just because someone wanted to remain their work in the
history does not warrant it. I believe the best would be to follow up with
maintainer and either 1) find out and explain in pkg-descr what this port
can do that base ed(1) cannot; or 2) cvs rm it.
../danfe
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"