--vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:41:35PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Eitan Adler thus spake:
> >On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval.
> >> However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I be=
lieve
> >> isn't necessary the maintainer approval.
> >
> >portmgr or secteam still needs to approve.
> >
> >
> Not only was this a bugfix, but it also covered a CVE. Is that still
> required for a timeout?
>=20
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/23/15
>=20
> I also added this to a note on this pr:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/165035
>=20
> That being said, is there going to be a vuxml write-up for this commit?
>=20
> -jgh
>=20
> --=20
> Jason Helfman
> FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve
If there a security fix just go ahead and commit along with a vuxml entry.
regards,
Bapt
--vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAk++lh8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex9TwCgiDYkFKzWspeYxcVz/P/4r6Sv
8rsAoLL6fGFdEJ0LMImrI4ka+pagxQXq
=YEGX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vOmOzSkFvhd7u8Ms--