Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo

On 24 May 2012 20:32, Marcelo Araujo <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Well, we are talking specifically in the case of haproxy. It doesn't break
> anything right, does it?
> So, I do believe there is no problem with that commit.

Agreed. I was just giving a rationale for why approval is still required ;)

-- 
Eitan Adler
Source & Ports committer
X11, Bugbusting teams
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"