openjade autodetection patch

--=-UjkAgP+QMBBa4gYBYf0k
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Would anyone object to the attached patch? It automates the task of
setting SGMLNORM to openjade's equivalent for people who can't or don't
want to install jade.

As a side-effect it changes the behaviour for people who have both jade
and openjade installed. Is that a problem?

RCS file: /home/dcvs/www/share/mk/web.site.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -a -u -r1.65 web.site.mk
--- web.site.mk 1 Mar 2005 23:04:59 -0000       1.65
+++ web.site.mk 17 Aug 2005 07:26:15 -0000
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@
 LOCALBASE?=3D	/usr/local
 PREFIX?=3D	${LOCALBASE}

-.if !defined(OPENJADE)
-SGMLNORM?=3D	${PREFIX}/bin/sgmlnorm
-.else
+.if exists(${PREFIX}/bin/osgmlnorm)
 SGMLNORM?=3D	${PREFIX}/bin/osgmlnorm
+.else
+SGMLNORM?=3D	${PREFIX}/bin/sgmlnorm
 .endif
 CATALOG?=3D	${PREFIX}/share/sgml/html/catalog
 SGMLNORMOPTS?=3D	-d ${SGMLNORMFLAGS} -c ${CATALOG} -D ${.CURDIR}


--=20
Pav Lucistnik <[e-mail]>
              <[e-mail]>

Fufie> snow should be on the tv and in the mountains, not here

--=-UjkAgP+QMBBa4gYBYf0k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBDAxfmntdYP8FOsoIRAqd2AJ0aB6k5RqMuyHvYxUzlOIGFZEjWDwCgvy2D
UVbwuvHMqztTgBbsO46WrZ8=
=H1yL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UjkAgP+QMBBa4gYBYf0k--