----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_19_02_10_29_2005_854)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Simon,
"Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org> wrote
in <20050612170112.GT821@zaphod.nitro.dk>:
si> The doc packages have now been more or less broken for about a year
si> (yes I should have gotten around to looking at it, but...) and I have
si> yet to hear anyone mention this (other than ceri in the docs/71153).
si>
si> So, is there really a point in keeping doc packages around? I don't
si> really think they are that interesting and they in account for a large
si> part of doc/ on the FTP mirrors.
I guess few people know about the doc packages and/or most of people
read the docs online only...
Well, what do you think about removing the current doc packages and
providing ports which simply fetch and install tarballs built
in doc/$LANGCODE during a full build?
In the ports collection, periodical build check is performed
on pointyhat and they have better visibility for people, I think.
--
| Hiroki SATO
----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_19_02_10_29_2005_854)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDBMEFTyzT2CeTzy0RAgTtAKDA5uyL7lwmdKDqiITl5DID0j7LswCdFsSR
4tZOS1zfaMlwdhmQqGwv5SM=
=ZWad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_19_02_10_29_2005_854)----