Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man7 security.7 src/sbin/init init.8

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep__7_06_28_51_2005_732)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Gary W. Swearingen" <[e-mail]> wrote
  in <[e-mail]>:

ga> garys       2005-09-03 17:16:00 UTC
ga>
ga>   FreeBSD src repository (doc committer)
ga>
ga>   Modified files:
ga>     share/man/man7       security.7
ga>     sbin/init            init.8
ga>   Log:
ga>   Moved descriptions of securelevels from init(7) to security(7).
ga>
ga>   Files used both "securelevel" and either "secure level" or
ga>   "security level"; all are now "security level".

 Did we all agree with using "security level" instead of "secure level"?
 "secure level" is still used as a manual page alias (securelevel(8)),
 a sysctl MIB, and in other docs in doc/en_US.ISO8859-1, so I am afraid
 people will be confused.

--
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep__7_06_28_51_2005_732)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBDHgoTTyzT2CeTzy0RAsu7AKCiWbRsrEju6O3/pj/h/lmdcnXo/ACfV7Px
qzyhrw5KNdUXpJ2lbJmN/r4=
=2UjB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep__7_06_28_51_2005_732)----