On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 19:22:21 -0500
linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:53:35AM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > I'm thinking if we shouldn't impose documenting in PH the new things
> > that go in bsd.*.mk's files (the things that are supposed to go in
> > CHANGES). (don't commit if you don't document it in PH or at least
> > provide a non-doc-book version so more proficient doc people can do
> > it fast).
>
> Yeah, well, the rulemaking stuff can get pretty unpopular sometimes.
> I'll settle for "suggest" for most stuff these days.
Ah. so it depends of what side of the ruling process you are ? Never
thought of that. :)
And now that my partner is in Berlin for a week I'm left here doing
more ruling that my usual; I guess it became a learned habit. :)
> Patches welcome btw :-) A lot of work is needed here.
Promise to send when I crash my head against something that's not in PH.
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"